Photodynamic therapy 
        (PDT) is a treatment that uses a combination of a photosensitizer (a 
        light activated drug) and a laser light to destroy abnormal cells. The 
        primary use of PDT is as an alternative to esophagectomy (the surgical 
        removal of the esophagus) for patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) 
        and early cancer in Barrett's esophagus. 
        The first step in PDT 
        involves the administration of a chemical photosensitizer, some of which 
        becomes concentrated in the abnormal esophageal mucosa (5-aminolevulinic 
        acid) and some in the stroma (porfimer sodium). The only approved 
        photosensitizer in North America is porfimer sodium (Photofrin® [Axcan 
        Pharma Inc, Birmingham, AL]), which is given intravenously.  Laser light 
        is then delivered two-three days later using a specially designed light 
        delivery balloon.  Activation of the photosensitizer by an 
        endoscopically applied light source at the appropriate wavelength (630 
        nm for porfimer sodium) induces the generation of singlet oxygen 
        and other cytotoxic species that contribute to the destruction of the 
        abnormal esophageal mucosa, resulting in deep injury that is associated 
        with significant morbidity (11). Photofrin remains in the skin for up to 
        2 months and thus the patients must avoid direct exposure to sunlight 
        and bright lights during this time, since exposure to light may result 
        in severe sunburn (12).    
        
        Overholt et al. have published extensively 
        regarding their experience of using PDT in 103 patients, most of whom 
        had HGD. The mean follow-up in this group was over 4 years. Of the 65 
        patients with HGD, 78% had their HGD eliminated. On the basis of an 
        intention-to-treat analysis, 54% had no residual Barrett Esophagus.  The 
        primary complication of PDT for Barrett's esophagus is esophageal 
        stricture, scarring and narrowing of the esophageal lumen. The overall 
        stricture rate for patients treated with PDT was 30%, but for those who 
        required more than one PDT treatment it was 50%.  Such strictures are usually responsive to 
        endoscopic balloon dilation.  Another 
        important finding in patients undergoing PDT with apparent squamous re-epithelialization 
        is the presence of residual patches of subsquamous intestinal metaplasia.  Subsquamous, nondysplastic intestinal metaplasia occurred in 4.9% 
        of patients, but more importantly 3 patients (4.6%) developed 
        subsquamous adenocarcinoma (13).  The occurrence of subsquamous 
        intestinal metaplasia is reported in virtually all studies using PDT: in 
        detailed pathology studies the prevalence is reported to be as high as 
        51.5% (14). Other side effects reported with PDT include chest pain, 
        dysphagia, odynophagia, pleural effusions,
        Candida esophagitis, and atrial fibrillation.  In addition, esophageal perforation and 
        tracheoesophageal fistulas have been reported, but are rare (<1%) (15).  
        
        Esophagectomy remains the gold standard 
        treatment for HGD. As techniques and technology improve, it is likely 
        that ablative strategies will become an important part of the 
        armamentarium in the treatment of Barrett’s esophagus (16).  A recent 
        cost-effectiveness analysis of PDT for HGD in Barrett's esophagus found 
        PDT to be a cost-effective alternative to esophagectomy, even though it 
        incurs the greatest lifetime cost (US $47,310) compared with 
        esophagectomy (US $24,045) (17).