Home General Diagnostics Information Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics Current Point-of-Care Diagnostics Current Diagnostics Companies Future Point-of-Care Diagnostics References

 

Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics

 

 

(Source: http://www.cola.org)

 

 

Clinical Laboratory settings are large spaces where medical diagnostics equipment and reagents are stored and used by clinicians to test blood, urine, and other bodily fluids for biological abnormalities. Although most laboratories try to carry the proper equipment and tools used to carry out routine tests, some tests need to be outsourced to other laboratories due to lack of personnel or testing equipment. Several clinicians work in the lab together and need to be constantly involved in the processing and handling of all reagents, additives, and processes. As a result, tests performed in a laboratory can be expensive due to large facilities, expensive equipment, clinician wages, and mass quantities of disposables and reagents used. Additionally, many results can be time consuming to perform on the order of hours to weeks and human errors are likely to occur.

 

 

Laboratory flow chart

Most laboratory diagnostics tests are requested by a doctor or nurse and the patient then has to have several vials of blood drawn which is then transported from the site of drug sampling to the central laboratory. Labels are placed on the blood vials indicating whose blood it is and which test is to be performed. The requests and queries of which labs to be performed are maintained on a central computer for both the lab clinicians and the doctors to track the process. Following some time of storage and wait, the blood is analyzed by a laboratory clinician and lab results are given and validated. This information is then re-entered into the central computer and the doctor who made the request can then further analyze the results and decide what steps to take with the patient next.

 

 

(Source: Schleicher, 2006)

 

 

 

Current Limitations

According to a study performed by Plebani and Carraro in 1997, an emergency laboratory had errors in about 0.5% of the lab tests performed. Further analysis of the laboratory process revealed that over two thirds of these results occurred in the pre-analytical phase of the testing phase. Meaning that most errors occurred from the time the blood was taken to the patient, labeled, transported to the central lab, logged into the central computer and waited to be analyzed. However, only a small percentage of the error resulted from the actual analytical process and about 20% occurred in the post analytical stages of validation and returning the information to the doctor. As observed from this study, there is room for improvement in the laboratory testing process. Not only are errors of primary concern, but often the test results can be rendered useless if it takes too long for the processing and analysis to occur in order for the doctor to make a timely decision about how to treat the patient.

 

 

(Source: Schleicher, 2006)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source: onthefencefilms.com/blog/index.php?cat=7)

 

 

 

Home General Diagnostics Information Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics Current Point-of-Care Diagnostics Current Diagnostics Companies Future Point-of-Care Diagnostics References